-
Hoppe and Yarvin are both Neo-Marxists
Hans-Hermann Hoppe and Curtis Yarvin are often presented as radical alternatives to modern political thought. Hoppe, a Rothbardian economist and anarcho-capitalist, defends natural order, private property, and elite authority against democratic egalitarianism. Yarvin, known for his theory of neocameralism and critique of “the Cathedral,” rejects liberal democracy in favor of…
-
Hoppe, the Frankfurt School, the Austrian School and Libertarianism (V 2.0 / Part 2)
Hans-Hermann Hoppe is often regarded as one of the most radical figures in the libertarian tradition. A Rothbardian in economics, a Kantian in ethics, and an anarcho-capitalist in politics, Hoppe offers a powerful critique of democracy, egalitarianism, and the modern state. But beneath his property-centric framework lies a surprising parallel:…
-
Hoppe, the Frankfurt School, the Austrian School and Libertarianism (V 1.0 / Part 1)
Hans-Hermann Hoppe is often regarded as one of the most radical figures in the libertarian tradition. A Rothbardian in economics, a Kantian in ethics, and an anarcho-capitalist in politics, Hoppe offers a powerful critique of democracy, egalitarianism, and the modern state. But beneath his property-centric framework lies a surprising parallel:…
-
Why libertarians should embrace anti-culturalism and universalism
Multiculturalism, interculturalism, monoculturalism, and nationalism. They share a common idea – that cultural identity must be framed, defended, administered, sometimes imposed. Against this logic, anti-culturalism stands as a radical rupture: no national unity, no community mosaic, no managed dialogue of differences. No culture should govern our lives. I. Culture as…
-
I created a mirror version of this website/blog on Medium.com
Nowadays, we don’t know if we are going to be censured or not, so, I created a mirror version of this place on Medium, this blog remains the main place where I publish everything, but some backup might be necessery eventually, I don’t know the future, but we most be…
-
Why classical liberalism is a kind of proto-Marxism
And Why the True Tradition of Liberty Comes from Aristotle to the Austrians For generations, classical liberalism has been marketed as the origin of Western liberty: the philosophy of individual rights, markets, and limited government. But this story is misleading. Classical liberalism was not the foundation of freedom, but a…
-
Hoppe is still an universalist
Introduction Hans-Hermann Hoppe is widely known for his libertarian theory of argumentation ethics, a bold attempt to rationally prove the non-aggression principle (NAP) through the very act of engaging in discourse. While Hoppe explicitly distances himself from Kantian moral universalism and Enlightenment rationalism, a closer analysis reveals a deep irony:…
-
Why We Should Stop Using the Term Progress and Let’s Talk About Evolution Instead
Libertarians should be cautious with the word progress. While it sounds appealing, it carries ideological baggage. Progress implies a fixed goal, a single direction, and often a centralized authority to define it. It’s the language of technocrats, planners, and moral crusaders—not of free individuals. Today, progress is mainly used by…
-
Why We Should Stop Using the Terms ‘Capitalism’ and ‘Socialism’
The terms capitalism and socialism are deeply loaded and often misleading. They confuse more than they clarify, and if we want to persuade others, we need to drop them in favor of clearer language. A better framework is to distinguish between centralized and decentralized economics: While some may equate decentralized…
-
Markets, not reactionary
The problem with reactionary thinking is that it runs counter to libertarian principles. At its core, libertarianism trusts that the free market is a self-regulating mechanism, capable of efficiently allocating resources and fostering economic growth. When individuals adopt destructive or “degenerative” behaviors, the market—being the sum of all voluntary actions…