Introduction — The Myth of the Libertarian Empire
At first glance, the Koch brothers appear as the great patrons of liberty in the modern age. Through their vast philanthropy, they have poured hundreds of millions into organizations like the Cato Institute, George Mason University, and the Atlas Network — all presented as bastions of free-market thought. For many observers, this constellation of think tanks embodies the intellectual resistance to statism.
Yet the reality is far more complex. The Koch network — mockingly nicknamed the “Kochtopus” by libertarian theorist Samuel Edward Konkin III — has not liberated the libertarian movement. It has captured it. What began as a radical intellectual rebellion against the state has been transformed into a corporatist machine, aligned with business lobbies, state subsidies, and establishment respectability.
The Kochtopus is not a force of emancipation but a mechanism of containment. It exists to make “liberty” compatible with power — to transmute anarcho-capitalist radicalism into safe, donor-friendly neoliberalism.
1. Origins of the Kochtopus: From Radical to Respectable
The origins of the Kochtopus trace back to the 1970s, when Charles Koch, then an admirer of the Austrian School, began funding libertarian projects. Early on, Koch supported the Libertarian Party, Reason magazine, and above all, Murray Rothbard, whose writings had inspired a generation of radical anti-statists.
But by the late 1970s, a schism emerged. Koch, increasingly eager for political legitimacy, clashed with Rothbard’s uncompromising anarchism. The result was the now-infamous Cato Institute purge of the early 1980s, when Rothbard and other radicals were expelled to make room for a more “mainstream” brand of libertarianism — one friendly to Washington think-tank culture.
As journalist Brian Doherty recounts in Radicals for Capitalism, this period marked a decisive shift. Libertarianism ceased to be a revolutionary movement aimed at abolishing the state and became an academic exercise: polite, technocratic, and ideologically declawed. Rothbard himself would later remark that the Cato Institute had become a “Beltway libertarian” operation — more interested in policy memos than in freedom.
2. The Atlas Network: The Kochtopus Goes Global
Having secured its ideological base in Washington, the Kochtopus soon expanded its reach through the Atlas Network, a meta-think-tank founded by Antony Fisher in 1981. The Atlas Network coordinates and funds over 500 “free-market” institutes worldwide — including Canada’s Montreal Economic Institute (MEI), the UK’s Institute of Economic Affairs, and Latin America’s Fundación Libertad.
On the surface, this looks like a flourishing of liberal thought. In reality, it is a franchise model of controlled dissent. Each member organization repeats the same formula: promote deregulation and privatization — but never question corporate power, central banking, or imperial foreign policy.
By sanitizing the radicalism of the Austrian School and filtering out figures like Rothbard and Konkin, the Atlas Network has turned libertarianism into market managerialism — a worldview that seeks not to abolish the state but to make it “efficient” for elites.
In Quebec, the MEI exemplifies this pattern. It preaches economic freedom while refusing to challenge corporate subsidies, monopolies, or the deep entanglement between state and big business. In this way, it reproduces exactly what Konkin warned against: “corporate libertarianism masquerading as radical thought.”
3. The War Against Rothbard
No figure has been more systematically erased from the Kochtopus’s pantheon than Murray Rothbard, the intellectual founder of modern anarcho-capitalism.
While Rothbard laid the philosophical foundation for total liberty — a society free of both state coercion and corporate privilege — Koch-funded institutions treat him like a heretic. A search through the archives of organizations like Cato or MEI reveals barely a handful of references to him. His works are not celebrated but buried.
This omission is not accidental. Rothbard’s writings reject the very compromises upon which the Kochtopus thrives. His vision of a stateless society, governed by voluntary order and natural law, directly contradicts the cozy relationship between think tanks and political elites.
Lew Rockwell, Rothbard’s close ally and the founder of the Mises Institute, has openly accused the Kochs of attempting to erase Rothbard from libertarian history. Rockwell recalls that after their split in the early 1980s, Koch operatives sought to isolate and delegitimize Rothbard’s circle, even encouraging scholars to boycott the Mises Institute.
Thus began what might be called the intellectual counter-revolution of libertarianism: the substitution of genuine radicalism with safe, corporate-friendly moderation.
4. From Libertarianism to Corporate Neoliberalism
In the decades that followed, the Kochtopus perfected its art of ideological capture.
Instead of challenging power, it sought proximity to it. Instead of rejecting the state, it learned to lobby it. Think tanks once founded to destroy central banking now receive grants from central banks. Activists once devoted to dismantling empire now advise the Pentagon on “market-based” interventions abroad.
The intellectual mutation was complete: libertarianism had become neoliberalism — a managerial doctrine for elites seeking to privatize profit while socializing risk.
This perversion is visible in the selective use of Friedrich Hayek, a thinker whose moderation suited the Kochtopus perfectly. Hayek’s Constitution of Liberty — with its acceptance of welfare, central banking, and social safety nets — provides a convenient intellectual fig leaf for corporate think tanks.
As Rothbard observed, Hayek’s version of liberalism is “an ideological halfway house” — a philosophy for those who want markets without moral consequences, capitalism without capitalists, and freedom without responsibility.
5. The Hypocrisy of “Freedom”
The myth of the Kochtopus is that it defends liberty. In truth, it defends privilege.
As journalist Jane Mayer documented in Dark Money, the Koch network’s vast political influence is designed to shape laws, universities, and media in ways that serve its industrial interests. Behind every “economic freedom index” lies a donor report. Behind every “policy reform” lies a lobbying contract.
The hypocrisy is breathtaking:
- The same corporations that preach competition lobby for energy subsidies and tax exemptions.
- The same think tanks that condemn government spending depend entirely on philanthropic oligarchs.
- The same “libertarians” who claim to defend peace have quietly funded hawks and interventionists aligned with U.S. foreign policy.
This is not liberty. It is corporate feudalism — a system where the state acts as the armed wing of oligarchic capital, and libertarian rhetoric serves as camouflage.
6. Agorism and the Spirit of Resistance
Against this backdrop of co-optation, Samuel Edward Konkin III’s agorism emerges as the true libertarian resistance.
Agorism rejects both state socialism and corporate capitalism. It proposes the counter-economy: a network of voluntary, decentralized, and often grey-market exchanges that bypass the state entirely. It is not a reformist doctrine but a revolutionary strategy — one that seeks to dissolve state power through peaceful market action.
In this sense, Konkin and Rothbard converge. Both understood that true markets can only exist outside state control — and that alliances with corporatism are a betrayal of liberty itself.
To reclaim libertarianism, modern thinkers must return to this radical lineage: Rothbard, Konkin, Rockwell, and Mises. Not to romanticize the past, but to rebuild the intellectual integrity of a movement that has been deliberately neutered by billionaires in suits.
Conclusion — Reclaiming the Word “Liberty”
Today, the Kochtopus stands as a warning: even the philosophy of freedom can be colonized.
Through think tanks, universities, and media, the Koch empire has turned “libertarianism” into a brand — respectable, technocratic, and hollow. But liberty is not a public-relations slogan. It is a living ethic rooted in individual sovereignty, moral responsibility, and voluntary order.
To be a libertarian in the true Rothbardian sense is not to reform the state but to abolish it — and to expose the corporate elites who hide behind the language of markets to perpetuate domination.
The task before us is therefore clear:
- To reject the Kochtopus and its intellectual puppets.
- To restore Rothbard to his rightful place as the conscience of the movement.
- And to build a genuine free society grounded in decentralized cooperation, counter-economics, and moral courage.
Freedom cannot be funded by oligarchs. It must be lived, defended, and practiced — beyond both the state and its corporate accomplices.
Leave a Reply